Red Sox, Roddick, Romo and Rafa: Overcoming Contraints to Win
Last night the devastation unfolded – the Red Sox lost their wild card run in the 9th inning with two outs, only four minutes after the Rays completed a 0-7 comeback to defeat the Yankees 8-7. The Red Sox season is over after having the worst September in franchise history, or 7-20 to be exact. How could a team with so much talent and such a huge payroll ($160 million, or 3rd highest in the league) have such an epic downfall?
The analysts immediately have the answers, or at least the right questions. What went wrong? Was there dissension in the clubhouse? Was Francona to blame? What will happen to the free agents?
After a rather disappointing year and loss at the US Open, TV analysts had many questions for Andy Roddick, including an explanation of his performance and prediction of the future. In fact, he had a rather amusing comeback, I thought. He claimed that anyone can be an expert when it comes to analyzing a tennis match. Specifically, if something is working, that’s what is good. If and it’s not working, he/she should have done the other thing.
Tony Romo has gone from from “choking” in the Cowboys’ first game of the season to pulling out two consecutive victories in the clutch, despite cracked ribs and punctured lungs. Can the TV analysts explain how he went from “soft” to “brave” all in a matter of days?
We can all be experts when we’re examining someone else’s performance, but what if the spotlight is on us?
Last week I read a lovely post written by Rajesh Setty – Why MOST smart people are better at solving other people’s problems. Raj suggests the person with the problem has many constraints (e.g., lack of confidence, pitching without adequate rest, a cracked rib, illnesses) that the observant smart person can’t see or understand. Operating without these constraints, the smart person can more easily see a solution to the problem.
So how do some people overcome pain, illness and epic slides to win – while others do not?
As Rajesh admits in his post, we all have problems. Whether we’re a pro athlete or regular person, problems are a part of life. If we focus on the physical constraints, the unforced errors, and the missed opportunities, it’s hard to overcome the problems, even is a smart person can rationalize the winning strategy.
Last night, the Rays overcame a 7 point deficit in two innings to beat a solid Yankees team. Maybe Evan Longoria and the rest of the team had a resolve or confidence that no one could shake.
Romo’s ability to throw game winning passes goes far beyond painkillers, at least in my opinion.
Maria Sharapova has one of the best 3rd-game winning records on the tour. Apparently, she has a bad memory and can “let go” of mistakes to focus on the moment at hand.
I just got the new book by Rafael Nadal, entitled Rafa, and the back cover states: “During a match, you are in a permanent battle to fight back your everyday vulnerabilities, bottle up your human feelings. The more bottled they are, the greater your changes of winning, so long as you’ve trained as hard as you play and the gap in talent is not too wide between you and your rival….It’s a kind of self-hypnosis, a game you play, with deadly seriousness, to disguise your own weakness from yourself, as well as your rival.”
How many stories of successful business people start with defeat, demise and personal devastation?
I am not sure how or why some people are destined for greatness, but maybe it’s a combination of self-confidence, a will to win, focus, an ability to block out constraints and who knows what else.
But like Papelbon said after the game last night, “What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger.”
That’s a good start, at least.
Photo courtesy of Huffington Post.














Melinda Hinson Neely runs a business, runs a household and still manages to run marathons. She has consulted with many clients in the health and wellness industry, and more importantly, has stayed healthy and happy while juggling meetings, relocations, business trips, marriage and children.